Theo 202 Quiz 3

  1. Theo 202 Quiz 3 Question
  2. Theo 202 Quiz 3 Quizlet
  3. Theo 202 Quiz 3 Answers
  4. Theo 202 Quiz 3 Grade
  5. Theo 202 Quiz 3 0
  6. Theo 202 Quiz 3 Math

View Test Prep - Theo 202 quiz 7.docx from REL 230 at Virginia Western Community College. Question 1 5 out of 5 points Virtually all scholars believe in the rapture. Selected Answer: False Question.

Quiz 2 Study Guide
  • On Stuvia you will find the most extensive lecture summaries written by your fellow students. Avoid resits and get better grades with material written specifically for your studies.
  • View Test Prep - Theo 202 Quiz 3.docx from THEO 202 at Liberty University Online Academy. User Course THEO 202 Test Quiz 3 Started Submitted Due Date Status Attempt Score Time.
  • THEO 202 Quiz 5 THEO 202 Quiz 5 Liberty University Set 1. The Calvinist position of perseverance states The Arminian view of perseverance states A benefit of adoption is becoming God’s child. In one sense, union with Christ is an inclusive term for the whole of salvation.

Towns: pp. 485–552
Be able to define and distinguish between the external and internal law.
External law: is expressed in precepts, prohibitions of dictates
Internal law: man is born with an innate knowledge of God
Understand the theological concept of a “covenant of works” as applied to Adam. What conclusion does the textbook reach regarding the legitimacy of a “covenant of works?”
God and Adam entered into a covenant in which if Adam did not sin, he would be removed from probationary period and reciveve a confirmed state of immortality.
What opinion does the textbook purpose regarding the nature of the Tree of Life’s existence?
It was instrument to test the motives of Adam, to reveal if he could demonstrate his virture through obedience
Know the three avenues of temptation through which Satan tempted Eve.
1.Lust of the eyes
2.Lust of the flesh
3.Pride of life
QuizUnderstand the distinctions between the Arminian and Calvinist views of total depravity, and be able to provide a biblical definition of it.
Arminian: Man can reason himself to God fully developed in the enlightment era. Man is capable of doing spiritual good. Moral works can be performed.
Calvinism: Man cannot reason except trhough the grace of God. Man can do not good until salvation occurs. No moral works can be performed.
TheoBiblical Definition: Man can reason, but he can’t obtain merit from God. Man is unable to do spiritual works unless he is regenerated. Socially moral works can be performed by unbelievers
What is the textbook’s view regarding the nature (or reality) of the serpent found in Genesis 3?
Satan used an actual serpent.
At what point (and through what event) was the promise of God to “crush” Satan’s head fulfilled?
At Calvary when Satan was judged
Understand the nature of sin as revealed by Old Testament words as well as by New Testament words. Note the emphasis upon outward acts in Old Testament words and upon inward disposition in New Testament words.
Old - the idea of physically missing the mark or transgressing a known law or principle. the sinner is inwardly immoral and wicked, therefore subject to guilt and condemnation.
New - focuses not only on the outward acts of sin, but emphasizes the inner disposition and state of the soul.
Understand the various incorrect views regarding the nature or definition of sin as provided in the textbook and the lectures. • Dualistic Theory: a scheme that allows for the continuous existence of good and evil • Sin as connected with the limitations of man’s being: is a necessary cause that stems from our finite being. • Leibniz’s Theory of Privation: man was placed in the best possible world, afforded the best possible physical conditions, yet sinned because of a simple negation of being, an offense for which no efficient cause was needed, it just happened. • Sensuous Theory: assigns the origin and nature of sin to sensuous nature of man. When the soul is placed in connection to the physical organism. • Sin as Pride: theologians trace sin's origin to pride. • Sin as Natural Life: is merely natural life, 'life that is not, yet ethical' • Sin as Selfishness: represents an undue preference for one's happiness, as opposed to the happiness or welfare of our fellowman
Understand the distinction between actual and conditional sin.

Theo 202 Quiz 3 Question

Actual sin - an actual act of man who conscientiously chooses to violate a known law of God.
Conditional sin - describes the state in which man was born.
Be able to answer and explain the following questions: a. Does God tempt man to sin? No b. Should temptation be equated with sin? No
Understand and be able to distinguish between presumption and ignorance as well as sins of commission and sins of omission.
Presumption - a willful, premeditated and rebellious act by man to purposely deny and disobey God's clear command.Theo 202 Quiz 3
Ignornace - things that are done, yet the person is conscious of the fact that he is doing.

Theo 202 Quiz 3 Quizlet

Commission - definite intent to do evil

Theo 202 Quiz 3 Answers


Omission - intentional acts where man fails to do something he should do.

Theo 202 Quiz 3 Grade

Be able to distinguish between original guilt (imputed sin) and the reception of a sinful nature, both resulting from the Fall.Theo 202 Quiz 3
Original sin - focuses on man's condition at birth.Theo 202 Quiz 3
Sinful nature - a desire to do evil
Does “death”, when used theologically, refer to the cessation of existence, or does it refer to separation of something to something else? the separation of something to something else.
Note that imputation is a term that can possess inherent evilness or goodness, depending on the context to which it is applied.
True
What does it mean when it is said that the sin of Adam is imputed to his posterity?
Adam's sin is legally transmitted to the human race.
How should the “federal headship” view of imputation be defined? imputed guilt and the inheritance of a sinful nature

Theo 202 Quiz 3 0


How should the “seminal head” or “Augustinian” view of imputation be defined?
| |

Theo 202 Quiz 3 Math


all humanity exists in Adam
How can the “federal headship” view be distinguished from the “seminal head” view?
na